Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi Infiltrates Washington – 1.29.2008

Sheer lunacy is the only way I can describe this. Why should the U.S. government allow an Islamist News Organization to function in Washington D.C.? This would be akin to allowing a Nazi propaganda office to function here in America during World War II. Qaradhawi is nobody’s idea of a moderate, is banned from the United States and United Kingdom, and yet is allowed to fund this television station.

Sheer lunacy.

From MEMRI.

Prominent Sunni Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi

 Banned in U.S., Opens Washington D.C. Office of Islamist News Organization

Says It (IslamOnline) Is “The Jihad of Our Era”

On December 27, 2008, the Islamist news organization Islamonline.net (IOL), which is overseen by prominent Sunni sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, announced that it had opened an office in Washington, D.C. Following is information about the new office, and about Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi’s connection to it:

IOL “Aims to Contribute to Projecting Much-Needed True Image of Muslims”

According to the announcement, the new Washington office, located in the National Press Building, was opened “in an effort to reach out to its wider audience and larger readership.”

IOL English managing editor Muhammad Zidan said, “This new office stands as a step forward in realizing part of the aims and objectives of IOL – that is, promoting awareness about important events in the Arab, Muslim and larger world, in addition to providing services to Muslims and non-Muslims in several languages.” [1]

Acting Bureau Chief Ossama El-Shamy said that he would put all his efforts into guaranteeing the success and growth of IOL presence in, and coverage of, the U.S.

Kamal Badr, IOL English website editor-in-chief, said, “In a true sense, America can be called a multicultural and multi-ethnic society. It is full of activities with interests to Muslims… Here in Washington D.C., one has direct access to important activities and personalities that will definitely enhance our coverage. [The] Washington office is a step in a proper direction for the English website, in a sense that it will further provide it a solid media ground in the strategic areas for its international coverage.”

The announcement added that IOL “aims to contribute to projecting the much-needed true image of Muslims.”

Zidan said, “U.S. President-elect Barack Obama has proved that if there are persistent efforts, there can be a change… Islam has a universal appeal. We invite all the people, whether Muslims or non-Muslims, to come forward and express their views from [the] IOL platform.” [2]

 

IOL Founded, Supported, Supervised By Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi

IOL was, according to PBS, founded by prominent Sunni sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi. [3] In its early stages, Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi personally “adopted” IOL, [4] supported it, and supervised it, and, according to The Guardian, it has remained under his supervision. [5] Al-Qaradawi has promoted IOL in the media, especially on his weekly Al-Jazeera TV program. [6]

Al-Qaradhawi, who is banned from entering the U.S. and the U.K., [7] is among the top spiritual leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, and serves as a spiritual guide for many other Islamist organizations across the world. He heads the European Council for Fatwa and Research, and is founder and director of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS). [8]

Al-Qaradhawi’s activity in recent months has included preaching against Shi’ites and the spread of the Shi’a in the Sunni Arab world. [9] Most recently, in his Friday sermon of January 9, 2009 he promoted boycotting U.S. goods, including the Starbucks chain, as well as the U.K. chain Marks and Spencer, stressing to his audience, “[P]ut the boycott against the nation’s enemies into action. Every riyal you pay turns into a bullet in the heart of your brothers in Gaza and in other Islamic countries.” In the same sermon, he also said, “Oh Allah, take this oppressive, Jewish, Zionist band of people… and kill them, down to the very last one.’” [10]

 

Al-Qaradhawi: IOL is “The Jihad of Our Era”

According to Arab Media and Society, a publication of the Middle East Centre of St. Antony’s College, Oxford University, and the Kamal Adham Center for Journalism Training and Research at The American University in Cairo, IOL is “one of the most-visited Arabic/English Islamic web portals which issue fatwas.” In a promotional brochure for IOL, Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi said of its mission: “This project is neither nationalistic nor one aiming at a grouping or a group of people; it is a project for the entire Islamic community. It is the jihad of our era.” [11]

 

Al-Qaradhawi: IOL A Means “To Carry This Religion to All People Around the World”

In a speech posted on the website, Al-Qaradhawi stressed IOL as a means of fulfilling the obligation “to carry this religion to all people around the world… We [have already] used print, radio, and television. Today, there is a new medium known as the Internet. All religions have used it to call to their religions and sects. It is the duty of the Muslims to use this tool to call to their great religion, which God has granted them with, and leave others – who have lost their way – to call it… This is what this major, global project – Islam Online – is doing. It carries the message of Islam to the world.”

 


[1] http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1230121266417&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

[2] http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1230121266417&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

[3] http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/january-9-2009/islam-and-modernity/1880/

[4] According to Dr. Hamid Al-Ansari, as quoted in Arab Media and Society (U.K. and Egypt), January 2008, http://www.arabmediasociety.com/index.php?article=576&printarticle#_ednref1.

[5] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jan/25/worlddispatch.brianwhitaker.

[6] Arab Media and Society (U.K. and Egypt), January 2008, http://www.arabmediasociety.com/index.php?article=576&printarticle#_ednref1.

[7] MEMRI: Special Report No. 30, “Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi in London to Establish ‘The International Council of Muslim Clerics,’” July 8, 2004, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR3004 ; MEMRI: Special Dispatch No. 2162, December 29, 2008, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP216208.

[8] MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 2183, “Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi On Al-Jazeera Incites Against Jews, Arab Regimes, and the U.S.; Calls on Muslims to Boycott Starbucks and Others; Says ‘Oh Allah, Take This Oppressive, Jewish, Zionist Band of People… And Kill Them, Down to the Very Last One,’” January 12, 2009, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP218309.

[9] MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 481,”Recent Rise in Sunni-Shi’ite Tension (Part II): Anti-Shi’ite Statements by Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi,” December 16, 2008, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA48108 ;

MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 2080, “Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi in Interview With Egyptian Daily: Mubarak Should Step Down and Should Not Pass Presidency to Gamal; The Spread of the Shi’a Is A Danger,” October 16, 2008, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP208008.

[10] MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 2183, “Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi On Al-Jazeera Incites Against Jews, Arab Regimes, and the U.S.; Calls on Muslims to Boycott Starbucks and Others; Says ‘Oh Allah, Take This Oppressive, Jewish, Zionist Band of People… And Kill Them, Down to the Very Last One,’ ” January 12, 2009.

[11] Brochure, printed on the occasion of the IOL’s first anniversary and distributed at the 2000 Cairo book fair: Mashru al-umma fi-l-qarn al-hadi wa-l-ashrin. IslamOnline. Uktubir 1999-uktubir 2000 (Project of the Islamic community in the 21st century. IslamOnline. October 1999-2000).) As cited in Arab Media and Society (U.K. and Egypt), January 2008 http://www.arabmediasociety.com/index.php?article=576&printarticle#_ednref1.

Published in: on January 29, 2009 at 10:16 pm Leave a Comment

The Co-Existence of Humanity…Leaves Much to Be Desired – 7.14.2008

This comment was left by Enditthinks on my post about the NPT:

My only point of contention with your blog is the fact that the United States has so many nuclear arms that is not even slightly comparable with any other nation besides Russia. There is no reason for us to have so many ways to destroy each other. Also Nuclear Deterrence is not the only way that security can be maintained in this world.

I also disagree with your idea that Man cannot learn and turn to diplomacy. With regards to the amount of war and violence in the world we are actually living in a very safe period of human history. Do not let the powerless terrorist have control over your logic. They do not have the capacity to damage the entire world like nation states do. There has not been a major war between nations states (besides Iraq which the US started for no reason) since the Vietnam war.

We have learned that it is better to coexist.

As of August 31, 2007 (the most recent article I could find) the United States has 5,736 active nuclear weapons, of varying model and capability. As of December 31, 2006 3,696 were operationally deployed. I could not find a breakdown of the number of Russian nuclear weapons, but I thought this article was interesting. As we can see, Russia remains a nuclear threat, and that is a threat we must be prepared to counter. The world slept during the run-up to World War II, and the result was disastrous. Complacency must not dull the edge of our swords; this isn’t paranoia but merely a cold realization of the, shall we say, unfriendliness, of the world.

Nuclear deterrence may not be the only way to maintain stability (and I never said it was), but it certainly helped during the Cold War. Granted that the Cold War is over, but the fact that such weapons exist can certainly help keep people in line.

The United States and Europe are enjoying a period of relative calm, not the world. Due to our civilization, the values that have been cultivated over the years, and the horrors of past wars, has the West learned to appreciate peace. I think that the sad fact is that enough people died and the devastation was so great and far reaching in World War I and World War II that Western people were shocked into peace. Ethnic cleansing works much the same way; stability occurs afterwards not so much that people appreciate each other, in terms of realizing the equality of their neighbor, but that the factions have been bled dry.

If the terrorist is powerless, then what was 9/11 ? The Madrid Train Bombings ? The London Subway Bombings ? What about the 11,452 Jihadist attacks since 9/11 ? A chronic ailment of the West has been underestimating the enemy it faces. This is just another example. Major wars between nation states may have subsided (for know) but history is cyclical. Who is to rule out that nation states could not once again go to war once more? Russia (to use one example) is certainly staying belligerent and we have to be wary of that. Additionally, the emergence of proxy wars – one nation state using another faction for their own ends – cannot be ruled out. We have seen it many times in today’s era. For example, Iran has been waging war against the United States and Israel by supporting Hizballah and the Shi’ite Militias in Iraq. If such matters were dealt with in an honest fashion, we would realize that the United States is at War with Iran. Instead, we obfuscate and dither, while the enemies of the world wait for us to weaken and falter in our step. They watch from the shadows as a hungry predator who is waiting for his prey to show weakness.

In short, some of humanity has learned to co-exist, but not all.  Until the day when humanity decides to lay down arms (and that day will never occur) there will be war and conflict. It is the sad reality of our existence.

Mike Grant — Samnite Gladiator

Published in: on July 15, 2008 at 12:30 am Comments (1)

Sudan and Darfur – 7.10.2008

For as long as I can remember, there has been tribal war, mass rape, and rampant disease in Africa. Every once in a while, the amount of killing, bloodshed, and suffering reaches the attention of the oh so wise International Community. The United Nations and all of its associated Councils and Committees convenes and “denounces” the dictator in question, shows “disapproval”, or issues “non-binding” resolutions. If the bad behavior continues, then the all mighty sanctions are unleashed. Sometimes the United Nations even throws together a Peacekeeper Force – often a hodge-podge coalition of the unwilling – and deploys them in a combat zone. 

Sometimes, these forces are effective and others they are not. My knowledge of UN Peacekeeping missions is still limited, so I will focus on two I am familiar with.

SUDAN AND DARFUR

There are two missions that the UN is currently operating:

Sudan 

To be generous, going by the article, we will say that there are 15,000 UN personnel in Sudan. 10,000 are military personnel, who are tasked with:

a. A stable Sudan capable of conducting a peaceful referendum 61/2 years after the Mandate in South Sudan and Abyei.

b. The ability for South Sudan to determine Sudanese unity or peaceful secession.

c. The ability for Abyeito determine unification with Bar el Gazhal or separate status within North Sudan.

d. Provision for a stable environment in Southern Kordofan/Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile State to allow the peoples of those States through consultation come to an agreement that will be the final settlement of the political conflict in their State.

Sounds rather grand doesn’t it? Is it achievablethough? I do not believe the mission is achievable, not the money or manpower that the UN has committed. This raises the question – is the investment in men and money worth it, if from the very beginning it is acknowledged that the mission can’t be accomplished? Again, I would say no.

Sudan is the 10th Largest country in the world, 2,505,813 km2.  IFthere was actually civilian infrastructure in place (roads, airstrips, hospitals, towns, etc) then the mission would easier, but save for a few areas there is no infrastructure. And where the rebels live is tribal badlands. That means any force you send out in pursuit of these rebels has to equipped for the travel and you have to be able to resupply them while the combat force is out “hunting”. This means you need helicopters, fuel, pilots, mechanics, parts, etc. All of this gear has to arrive in a timely fashion, and the mechanics have to have the experience to actually fix the machine. 45 countries are contributing Peacekeeper forces to the Sudan mission – many of the countries are SouthAmerican, Asian and African Countries, which leads me to doubt their competency. Britain, Australia, and Germany are on the list along with other small European countries, and I have confidence in their armed forces, but confidence doesn’t win wars. Cohesion of force and logistics, combined with the proper tactics and strategy, win wars.

Cohesion of force will be impossible with this Peacekeeper Force. The language barrier and the technological barrier are two reason why. Imagine how many interpreters there have to be – what if some are killed? Immediately the cohesion and ability to combine arms is affected. African mechanics may not be trained to work on British or American helicopters, which they would almost certainly be using. Your pool of qualified mechanics just shrunk, which means the others will be worked that much harder. For instance, a damaged helicopter has to land at Point A. Point A has no mechanics cleared to work on the machine; that means that the helicopter has to be transported by land to another location, or another mechanic has to travel to Point A. Welcome to logistics.

Because of these issues, I doubt very much that the UN Mission will even be minimally successful in their stated strategic goals. The Western countries who signed on no doubt had good intentions, but good intentions can bite you in the ass:

“No good deed goes unpunished”

When you commit men and resources that will ultimately be wasted, because you lack the political will to go all the way, then you do every man you send to war a grave disservice. You relegate them to merely being a tool to boosting your political reputation.

Darfur Region

As you can from the map, the Darfur Region is fairly large. The United Nations plan a force of 20,000 – half of which would be African troops – but currently has deployed only 9,065. How can you control as big an area as is Darfur with 10,000 troops? You can’t! For the sake of brevity, I will refer you to what I wrote about Sudan proper; the same lessons still apply.

In the News:

Africa – War on the Rescuers

A Thin Coat of Blue – Important. Read It.

7 Peacekeepers Killed In Darfur Attack

Heed the lessons of war. Few do, to our detriment.

Mike Grant – Samnite Gladiator

Published in: on July 10, 2008 at 10:52 am Comments (1)

Oppression of Women – 6.4.2008

Where is Amnesty International? Where is the horde of Feminist Groups so eager to tell us of man’s discrimination and oppression of women? Where? The answer is that they are clearly elsewhere. Those he need them most, the women of the Middle East, are abandoned. Feminists are to concerned with “fair wages” and sexual “liberation” to care for the real victims of life. If only each and every one of these animals could be hunted down and killed. Watch the video. Absorb what you see. It is barbarism, plain and simple. Worse, it is barbarism wrapped in the false shrouds of honor, piety, and justice. There is no honor here, and there is nothing holy. There is merely evil.

From MEMRI.org :

On April 7, 2007, a teenage Yazidi Kurdish girl named Du’a Al-Aswad was stoned to death by a lynch-mob in Iraq, because she had violated her family’s honor. A video of the stoning, filmed by the participants themselves using their mobile phones, was posted on http://leilamagazine17.blogspot.com/2008/02/blog-post_6785.html .

A year after the stoning, Saudi reformist and human rights activist Wajeha Al-Huweidar wrote a scathing article in which she harshly criticized the sexist character of Arab culture and particularly the phenomenon of “honor killings.”

The following are excerpts from her article, which appeared on the reformist website www.aafaq.org.

“This Entire Part of the World [is Full of] Defeated and Dejected Men, Whose Only Way to Feel Victorious Is by Beating Women to Death”

“Last April, a 17-year old Iraqi girl named Du’a Khalil Al-Aswad fell in love with a boy from a different [religious] sect. By this act, she violated the ‘honor’ of the men in her sect, causing them to go mad with the boiling [rage] of hellfire. Their male [egos] swelled like cancerous tumors, and their minds locked into the primitive madness of ‘honor.’

“They filled with restless madness, and in order to relive their anguish, they hurried to sentence poor Du’a to death, and then decided to carry out their sentence in the ugliest possible imaginable, i.e., by public stoning. They killed her with the utmost cruelty and depravity.

“Du’a Al-Aswad is a victim of the wild male madness called ‘honor.’ This concept is prevalent throughout the Greater Middle East [Al-Sharq Al-AwsatAl-Kabir], or perhaps I should say the Greater Filthy East [Al-Sharq Al-AwsakhAl-Kabir], since it is worthy of this label from every perspective – in particular [when it comes to] the treatment of women. From Pakistan and Afghanistan through Iran, the Middle East, and all the way to Morocco, this entire part of the world [is full of] defeated and dejected men, whose only way to gain some sort of victory is by beating their women to death.

“The depraved men who participated in the stoning of Du’a – all of them [guilty of] premeditated and deliberate murder – were raised to believe that the lives of their women are theirs to control. That is why they competed with one another at stoning Du’a, and fought to film her as she gasped out her last breaths. These horrible men conspired to kill a young girl who had committed no crime and hurt no one. Each of them picked up a boulder and hurled it at her. [Feeling] prideful and glorious, they bashed in this young [girl's] head, and her blood pooled on the ground as she lay there dead…

“But killing her was not enough for them. After she was dead, they mutilated her young body, kicking her and piling more rocks on top of her. Then they broke out in cries of ‘Allah akbar,’ and ‘there is no god but Allah’ as though they had just won a strategic battle.

“Not one of them felt pity for her, not one of them lifted a finger to help her, and not one of them [even tries to] speak in her defense. They were like the stones they hurled at her – frozen and devoid of all compassion.”

 In the Middle East, the Life of a Woman Is Worth Far Less than That of an Animal

“Had Du’a been an animal, someone would have [probably] taken notice and tried to rescue her from these inhuman men. But she was a woman, and in the Greater Filthy East, the life of a woman is worth far less than the life of an animal.

“According to the norms of the East, [the concept of] ‘honor’ relates only to the behavior of women. Women have become easy prey for men, who murder them in order to restore their threatened sense of honor.

“Du’a is a victim of both men and women – she is a victim of her entire society. In a region that fosters its mens’ hostility until it becomes a raging demon, [men come to] feel that the women in their family are their property, to be treated any way they want.

“[This mentality is common among all Middle Eastern] men – Muslim and non-Muslim, Arab and non-Arab, rich and poor, educated and ignorant, great and small, those living in the West and those who have remained in their homelands – as long as they were raised in this region… that is riddled with the disease of ‘honor,’ or are of [Middle Eastern] origin. [All these men] have the potential to turn into raging beasts, especially if they were raised [to believe that] a woman’s body and [her behavior] in her private life have a [direct] bearing on their honor and on the honor of their family, clan, nation, sect and all their ancestors throughout the ages.

“All those who believe that honor [resides] in the woman’s body are potential murderers, and [could] someday murder a woman when their false sense of honor is aroused. All those who agree that a man has the right to murder a woman, or to cause her physical harm [for the sake of preserving] his honor, are potential killers.”

The Women of the Middle East Raise Their Own Executioners

“Those who believe that men have more rights than women, and raise their children to believe the same, are raising [more] men who will kill another Du’a in some other place. All those who believe that they have the right to hit a woman in order to ‘educate’ her or ‘correct her ways’ might be involved in the murder or harming of a woman.

“Any legislator who passes a law dealing leniently with ‘honor killings’ is just as culpable as those who actively participated in the murder of the victims – [just as culpable as] the murderers who have the blood of Du’a and of other women on their hands.

“All governments that discriminate between men and women in rights and duties, that shelter the perpetrators of ‘honor killings,’ and that give men either partial or complete control over women’s lives… collaborate with the perpetrators of these despicable crimes…

“On the anniversary of the death of the innocent Iraqi girl Du’a Khalil Al-Aswad, murdered in cold blood and in heinous male ferocity in front of eye witnesses, I say to the women of the Greater Filthy East: ‘Good for you for managing to raise beasts who delight in harming you and in shedding your blood and the blood of your daughters.’ [And] good for the countries and governments that attribute more importance to the lives of animals than to your lives and the lives of your daughters.

“Good for you for defending your beastly men and supporting them on political [issues]. Good for you for supporting their failing movements and wars, and their hostile thinking that allows [them] to humiliate and beat you.

“Good for you for creating your own executioners, and for supporting and aiding them. You know full well that many of them regard you as worthless beings existing [solely] for their pleasure.

“Good for you for [tolerating] these inhuman men, many of whom yearn to drink your blood and the blood of your daughters whenever the drums of revenge and ‘honor’ start beating in their rotting and petrified brains.”

Mike Grant — Samnite Gladiator

Published in: on June 4, 2008 at 9:43 pm Comments (5)

The Islamic Republic of Iran – 6.3.2008

I post this for the people who doubts the Islamist Aspirations of the current Iranian Government. Perhpas you won’t be so quick to do doubt the words of those who know what we are dealing with after reading this. As if the multitude of articles like this wouldn’t be enough to convince people.

From the Middle Eastern Media Research Institute: PDF

Iranian Women’s Magazine Shut Down for Publishing Investigative Article on Martyrdom Movement
By: M. Nissimov, Y. Mansharof and A. Savyon* *

Introduction

In late January 2008, the Media Supervision Committee of Iran’s Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance ordered the closure of the women’s movement monthly Zanan, which had appeared in Iran for 16 years. The order came after the magazine published an investigative article on istishhad(i.e. martyrdom) operations. The conservative news agency Fars reported, citing a knowledgeable source, that the magazine had been shut down for “breaking the law and defaming military and revolutionary institutions, including the Basij,” and for “publishing reports and [raising] issues that undermine [society's] spiritual security, morale, and ideological strength, and that create a sense of insecurity in society and discredit the status of women in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” [1]

The Zanan article in question dealt with the Iranian “martyrdom movement,” which has been registering Iranian men and women for suicide operations and training some to carry out these operations. Zananfocused on the women volunteers, quoting Firooz Rajai-Far, a leader of the martyrdom movement and secretary-general of the World Islamic Organization Headquarters for Remembering the Shahids, as stating that some 20,000 women have already signed up for martyrdom operations, constituting a third of the volunteers. Rajai-Far stated that because martyrdom was a “religious duty,” women did not require the permission of their fathers, their husbands, or “even of the ruling jurisprudent” – currently Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – to volunteer for martyrdom operations. She also stated that she approved of sending even seven-year-old children on suicide missions during a war. Rajai-Far herself has signed up for martyrdom operations, and has threatened the U.S. with suicide operations against its interests in the Gulf. [2]

In addition to presenting interviews with Rajai-Far and with women martyrdom-seekers, the article also described the controversy among religious scholars, clerics, and experts in Iran regarding martyrdom operations.

 

The Inculcation of the Martyrdom Culture under Ahmadinejad

The Iranian regime has tried to present the martyrdom movement as a voluntary enterprise independent of the state. However, the presence of Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) representatives at the movement’s registration ceremonies suggests that it is endorsed by the regime. [3]This assumption is further supported by the 2004 statement by Mohammad Ali Samedi, spokesman of the World Islamic Organization Headquarters for Remembering the Shahids, that “the martyrdom [operations] will begin only at the order of [Iranian Supreme] Leader [Khamenei].” [4] In a May 2008 speech to families of shahids, Khamenei characterized martyrdom as “a source of pride” and as “sacrifice in the path of God” which “gladdens [the heart of] God.” [5]

Moreover, martyrdom is a value personally endorsed and promoted by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and also by the official Iranian media, which stresses the importance of inculcating the “culture of martyrdom” in society. In a speech at a January 2008 Basij conference, Ahmadinejad stated that “today, more than ever, we must inculcate in the younger generation the culture of shahada [martyrdom]. This is a mission of supreme ideological [importance]… One who treads the path of martyrdom and brings himself to this extreme attains the pinnacle of human [achievement]. It is a duty incumbent upon [each member of] the public to bring himself, as well as others, to this pinnacle…”

In the speech, Ahmadinejad called martyrdom “the greatest legacy and future source [of power] of the Iranian people,” adding that “a society in which each and every individual is willing to sacrifice himself for the goals and values of divine purity, or for the sake of the culture of martyrdom, is a constructive, dynamic, and in fact unique society.” [6]

In a July 2005 speech, Ahmadinejad asked: “Is there an art more beautiful, more divine, and more eternal that the art of martyrdom? A nation with martyrdom knows no captivity. Those who wish to undermine this principle undermine the foundations of our independence and national security. They undermine the foundation of our eternity.” [7]

The value of martyrdom is also stressed by regime heads in their speeches. For example, at a February 2008 convention of IRGC clerics, Mohsen Mojtahed Shabestari, Khamenei’s representative in East Azerbaijan, underscored the importance that the regime attributes to it, saying: “The clerics’ most important mission is to preserve the spirit of martyrdom and to strengthen religious faith within society.” [8]

A similar point was made in an editorial titled “Iran’s Trump Cards against America” in the weekly Parto-ye Sokhan, affiliated with Ahmadinejad’s mentor Ayatollah Mohammad Taqi Mesbah-e Yazdi: “[Iran's] most effective deterrent against an attack is the army’s and the nation’s belief in martyrdom and in immortality [through] death for the sake of God. This [belief] eliminates all fear, and deters the enemy [i.e. the U.S.] from attacking Iran.” [9]It should be stressed that, in a July 2005 speech, Ayatollah Mesbah-e Yazdi himself called on the Iranian public to sign up for suicide operations against the U.S. and other “enemies of Islam.” [10]

Iran’s state-sponsored TV channels frequently air programs conveying messages of martyrdom. See, for example, MEMRI Clip No. 917, “Bridegroom Turns Suicide Bomber in Iranian Music Video” (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/917.htm ). [11]

 

Suicide Operations as an Element of Iran’s Security Strategy

Suicide operations form an integral part of Iran’s security doctrine. [12]This is evident from an October 2007 interview with IRGC deputy naval commander Ali Fadavi, in which he emphasized the significance, attributed to these operations by the regime, and described the close collaboration between the IRGC and the Basij in this area. Fadavi said: “Even small operations can greatly impact the strategic Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz… It is not the number of Basij soldiers that counts in realizing this plan, but their quality – because each one is capable of doing excellent work as a martyr… The Basij forces are still seeking martyrdom, and now this spirit is prevailing throughout the IRGC… If necessary, we will take advantage of [this willingness] for self-sacrifice… The IRGC and the Basij forces have begun to collaborate closely, and the fruit of these plans will be visible [to all] when the enemies become so stupid as to start posing an actual threat to Iran.” [13]

In early May 2008, IRGC Naval Commander Morteza Saffari said, “The existence of threats [against Iran] is [actually] a blessing for us… When the enemy threatens us with a [military] attack, we revive our culture of jihad and martyrdom [and] reinforce it, and our young people enhance their readiness, preparing themselves for [martyrdom operations]… The essence of the culture of jihad and martyrdom is [the ability] to create people who are actually willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of God.” [14]

“Dying in Order to Kill”

The following are excerpts from the Zanan article on women in the martyrdom movement, titled “Dying in Order to Kill,” which was published in the January 2008 issue of Zanan, and on the magazine’s website. [15]

 

 


The cover of the Zanan issue in which the article appeared

 

“A Thursday afternoon. The Behesht-e Zahara Cemetery in Tehran is very busy. We know only that the ceremony of the martyrdom-seekers [istishhadiyoun] is [supposed to] take place behind the martyrs’ plot. Almost none of the passersby know where that is. Many of them do not even know the meaning of the word istishhad [martyrdom]. Nearby,… behind Plot No. 26 – which contains those who fell in the [Iran-Iraq] war, some around 18 years of age and some closer to 30 – 150 chairs have been set out. These are intended for [the men and women] who have come to declare that even when there is no war they are willing to seek martyrdom.

“[This] is the inauguration of the fifth martyrdom unit. The area is abuzz with reporters and photographers, most of them foreign. The male martyrdom seekers are dressed in shrouds, with kafiyyas on their heads and identification tags around their necks. They sit and wait for the program to begin. On the other side are the women, most without kafiyyas, and in the corner [is a booth where] passersby can sign up [for suicide operations].

“An old woman comes by and asks ‘What’s going on here?’ The young woman behind the table replies, “Mother, which [option] would you like to register for? [A martyrdom operation] at one of the four holy sites in Iraq, [a martyrdom operation] against Salman Rushdie, or [a martyrdom operation] against the occupiers of Jerusalem?…

“The martyrdom seekers gradually arrive. At the sound of [his or her] name, each of them steps forward to receive the identification tags and to don the shroud.

“The Al-Usra Choir from Lebanon takes the stage and sings in Arabic. It looks as though, with the exception of the choir itself, nobody among the martyrdom seekers or the audience understands the lyrics. The only word recognized by all is muqawama – ‘resistance.’ At the sound of this word, spoken in a heavy Arabic accent, the martyrdom seekers raise their arms in a gesture which, I once read, symbolizes the oneness of God. The cameras begin to click, [taking] pictures that in a few hours will be circulated around the world.

“The sword writes in letters of blood – muqawama.

“See the blood spill

“Death to Israel

“Become one with this dead body that has the power to destroy [i.e. the dead body of the martyr]

“Death to Israel

“Like [blood]-red death [itself], have no mercy for the enemy’s army “There is no difference between soldiers and settlers. [16]

“…The fifth martyrdom unit is named after the Iranian martyr Nader Mahdavi. [17] The other [four] were named after Lebanese and Palestinian martyrs. The ceremony is attended by about 200 people…

“Several aspects of this convention draw [my] attention. The husky men are all dressed in civilian clothes. Few of them are in military uniform, and none are armed. Among the militant-looking masculine martyrdom seekers [stands] a small woman. It is hard to believe that she, of all people, is secretary-general of the World Islamic Organization Headquarters for Remembering the Shahids, and the organizer of this ceremony. In 1979, she was [among those] who scaled the wall of the ‘nest of spies’ [i.e. the U.S. embassy] in Tehran. She is also publisher and editor-in-chief of Sobh-e Dokouheh, the most conservative magazine in Iran. Today she is the leader of the martyrdom seekers, [both] the men and the women. [Her name is] Firooz Rajai-Far… [Standing] in a corner off to the side, I take the opportunity to ask her a few questions.

“‘We sign up [volunteers] only on particular occasions,’ [she tells me,] ‘because if we [signed up] too many volunteers and exceeded our capacity, we would lose contact with the volunteers and that would not be good. We get a lot of response from the public.’

“According to Rajai-Far, of the 55,000 Iranians who have volunteered for martyrdom operations, a third of them – that is, about 20,000 – are women. [She stresses that] there are no special requirements; anybody can sign up, but when volunteers are classified into units, their abilities are taken into account.

“Rajai-Far stresses: ‘Martyrdom operations are intended for the day [Iran] is occupied or [the day] the official forces of the regime collapse. In other words, if the army and Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps forces [ever] fail in their mission, God forbid, and Iran is occupied, then the martyrdom seekers will go into action.’

“Asked whether women need permission from their father or husband to sign up and take part in martyrdom operations, Rajai-Far replied: ‘All fatwas state that defense [of the homeland] is a religious duty incumbent upon [every] Muslim man and woman, and [consequently] there is no need for permission from the father or husband. There is even no need for permission from the Vali-ye Faqih[i.e. the jurisprudent ruling the state]. Among [our] recruits are many married women, and if, during their classification into units, a problem arises that requires obtaining permission from the [woman's] husband or father, she takes care of it herself. We do not interfere in these matters. Families that express willingness to carry out martyrdom operations usually regard this as a religious duty. We have [entire] families that have proudly signed up [for martyrdom operations] – from the seven-year-old child to the 70-year-old grandmother – wishing to walk the path [of the martyrs] as a family.’

“[I asked Rajai-Far:] If you [ever] have to [order] martyrdom operations, will you send a seven-year-old on a mission?’ [She answered:] ‘When we organize [the recruits] into units, we have certain priorities. Priority is given to [those with] physical and military ability, or even knowledge of foreign languages. I believe that readiness [to perform martyrdom operations] is a kind of deterrent [in itself]. That is, if state security is threatened, God forbid, all forces go into action, and if a seven-year-old has the opportunity, even he will defend [the homeland]. Seven-year-old children are already dying in wars. We see what is being done to seven-year-old children in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s not as if war spared children…

“‘The meaning of a martyrdom operation is that in order to hurt the enemy, you carry out a mission that you know will cost you your life. Even a child can carry out such a mission if circumstances require it. History has witnessed such events. During the [Battle of] Karbala, [18][nobody] said that 11-year-olds were exempt from going to war. [People] even asked if a child who fell [in battle] would be considered a martyr, and they were told that yes, he would be considered a martyr.’

“Rajai-Far does not consider age a criterion when it comes to carrying out martyrdom operations.

“[She says:] ‘[The volunteers] register [for our movement], and their preparedness builds up [with training]. The training is identical for everyone, and they all train for similar operations. There are no separate units for women, since our units are not gender-specific, and our outlook regarding men and women is identical. To date, 1,300 people have received the training and have attained the necessary [level of] preparedness.’

“[I asked:] ‘Do you call up individuals under 20 years of age for training?’ [She answered:] ‘No, when we form units we select recruits aged between 20 and 30.’

“[Asked] how the training takes place, [she said]: ‘Much of our training [program] is concerned with cultural and political matters, and with introduction to [various] principles of the world of Islam. [When we talk of] psychological preparation for martyrdom operations, that is, of mental readiness…, we mean [training] in how to infiltrate the enemy ranks… This psychological readiness requires a foundation of ideological guidance. During the Iran-Iraq war, the soldiers trained themselves not to fear death by digging graves and praying inside them. One of the tasks that [the volunteer must perform] in order to carry out a martyrdom operation is to rid himself of his fear of death.

“‘Another part of the training [program] is concerned with preparation for guerilla warfare. At present, we do not provide [classical] military training, because martyrdom operations are not operations of classical warfare, and do not require more than two hours of military training. We have experts who plan the operations, prepare the necessary gear, pick out the route [of advance], and, within two or three hours, train a suitable individual for the mission.’

“[Finally, I asked:]…Have you defined targets [for attack]?

“[She said:] ‘The targets will depend upon the circumstances, but we are ready, and we will go into action whenever the need arises.’

“… Behind the minibus, a young man and woman are donning their shrouds and covering their faces with kafiyyas. I follow them. The woman has not yet covered her face. Her eyebrows are plucked and her eyes are large and beautiful. She is 23 and has a degree in theology. A housewife, she has been married for four years. She and her husband are both martyrdom seekers.

“[I ask them:] Why have you come here today?

“[The woman answers:] ‘I signed up six months ago at the Zaitoun Girls conference. A little while ago we were contacted, and had our first guidance session. Today is the [unit's] inauguration.’

“Which options did you choose?

“‘We have not chosen options yet. We have only declared [our] willingness to carry out martyrdom operations.’

“If circumstances require it, would you be ready to perform such an operation?

“‘Yes.’

“…So if you are called upon tomorrow to perform a martyrdom operation, you will stick by your decision?

“‘After all, it’s not such a strange thing. During the liberation of Khoramshahr [in the Iran-Iraq war], when circumstances changed and [people] saw their family’s honor trampled and their relatives dying right before their eyes, a lot of ordinary people decided then and there to defend [the homeland] and join the war.’

“But that was during the war. There is a difference between [then and now]!

“‘You must always consider [the possibility of] a crisis. If [we] see people being killed before [our] eyes, many of us will wish to carry our martyrdom operations. Perhaps we will be few, but the young people in the streets will undertake to become martyrs… The Iranian youth is capable of many things.’

“What is the meaning of martyrdom?

“‘The [most] important aspect of martyrdom operations is that [they are carried out] when there is an imbalance [of power]. The martyr seeker conveys [the message] that even when our hands are empty, we do not lose our faith and our confidence…’

“Who are your enemies?

“‘Those who plunder the world and do not want peace to prevail in the world… For instance, Israel, which does not want peace…’

“What training have you received so far?

“‘We have only had one guidance session.’

“Where did it take place?

“‘I’m not sure I’m allowed to say. Ask the supervisor.’

“How did you come to know about the issue of martyrdom?

“‘My family, like everyone else, was in the Basij, and participated in the war [with Iraq], but I do not belong to one of the families of the martyrs…’

“Doesn’t the training… take up a lot of your time?

“‘No, martyrdom-seekers and Basij members must devote as much time [to training] as they devote to their studies.’

“When you are a mother, will you still be willing to martyr yourself?

“‘I am sure it will be very difficult, but my husband and I have decided to bring up our children to do the same…’

 

“Iran and the [Palestinian] Intifada

“The [Palestinian] Intifada has [a lot] to do with us. This can be gathered from Iran’s policies and positions on Palestine, and even more directly from television programs and from Iran’s official positions [as expressed] in the news [broadcasts]…

“The book Zaitoun Girlsmentions a religious fatwa which permits Iranians to carry out martyrdom operations. It also presents statements by Ayatollah Hossein Nouri Hamedani, who called for revering Palestinian women martyrs: ‘Circumstances have forced the Palestinian nation to choose martyrdom operations as their preferred strategic method of fighting… Based on [the principles of] Islam, Muslims regard [such] operations as a type of jihad and self-sacrifice for the sake of God, and carry them out honestly and faithfully…’

“In another part of the book, Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani mentions a martyrdom operation carried out by a 22-year-old [Palestinian] mother of two, characterizing it as one of the glorious episodes in the history of Islamic jihad fighters. He emphasizes that ‘the oppressed Palestinian nation (…) has no option but [to wage] intifada and [perform] martyrdom operations, [which are considered] jihad for the sake of God…’

 

“For and Against Martyrdom Operations

“Shi’ite clerics disagree about the status of those who carry out martyrdom operations… The positions of several senior Shi’ite clerics [on this issue] can be found on the Internet. Ayatollah Yousef Sanei referred [to this matter] in a [November 19, 2005] interview with the BBC, which is posted on his website. [He said:] ‘The difference between martyrdom on the battlefield [on the one hand] and bombings and [other acts of] terrorism [on the other is like the difference] between light and darkness, and between truth and falsehood. The two cannot even be compared. Martyrdom and [self-]sacrifice operations are permitted [only] in times of war, in confronting the enemy on the battlefield. Outside the battlefield, no acts of martyrdom, murder, or terrorism are permissible; they are nothing but [forms of] suicide. Murdering others is a terrible sin in Islam. Someone who kills himself while not on the battlefield, and kills even one other person [in addition to himself] – it is as though he has killed the entire world’…

“Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri [also addressed the question of martyrdom on his website.] In reply to a question by blogger ‘Siyasat9,’ he wrote: ‘The ruling on martyrdom operations depends on the circumstances, on the principles of shari’a, and on various [other factors]. Such operations require careful and painstaking consideration. If, at a certain time and place, martyrdom operations are required in order to protect Islam and Muslim lives from military attack by the enemies, and the [martyrdom] operations do not entail killing [civilians or committing other] violations – then [these operations] are permitted. Deciding this issue is the task of the religious experts.’

“Zohreh Sefati, a lecturer at a religious seminary for women, also wrote on the same blog, in reply to a question about martyrdom: ‘The ruling of the primary source [i.e. the Koran] on this issue is that suicide operations [intihar] are prohibited, unless they serve the interests [of Islam], and are used as a tactic and method of deterrence against the infidels. The fact is that when the Muslims are at war with an infidel enemy who is fighting them, various methods of warfare should be employed to stop the attacks. If [martyrdom operations] will cause the enemy to retreat, and there is no other way, then [such operations] are permitted as a secondary [option].’

“Ayatollah Fazel Lankarani was also asked on this blog about martyrdom operations, and he replied: ‘The Palestinian question is a question of defense. Defending the Muslim people, principles or [countries] is always permissible, [using] every means.’ This ruling shows that in answering [the question of] whether Islam permits martyrdom operations, the [religious scholars] considered the conditions that prevail in Palestine more than they considered [the conditions prevailing] in Iran…

 

“The Politicians’ Silence about the Martyrdom Seekers

“So far, not a single high-ranking figure in Iran has taken a clear and definite stance regarding martyrdom operations, especially regarding the participation of women in such operations. A few months ago, when the 2006 Lebanon war broke out, the martyrdom-seekers [tried to] speak out, but the authorities immediately silenced them. The then-spokesman of the World Islamic Organization Headquarters for Remembering the Shahids said…: ‘Two groups that have received technical training have been dispatched to Lebanon via Syria. These two groups, one with nine members and the other with 12, have entered Lebanon in order to assist the [bands] of wounded and embattled soldiers [there], and will not leave until Hizbullah achieves absolute victory over the regime that is occupying Jerusalem.’

“After this report was published, Basij commander Hejazi made an official statement saying: ‘Iran is not sending any military force to Lebanon; there will be no [Iranian] military presence in the [conflict] zone’…

 

“Zahra’s Last Testament

“Her [body and] face are covered, and only her eyes are showing, but it is clear that she is a big girl. She is a single 22-year-old, in her third year at university, and she is eager to join the war and become a martyr:

“‘So far I have only participated in one guidance session,’ [she says.] ‘In the session, they explained about the culture of martyrdom. [They described] the types of operations that we would have to carry out, and [discussed] those who have carried out such operations in the past, [urging us] to be like them. They quoted Ayatollah Khomeini, [who said] that it was necessary to create a network of martyrs, and that such a network was essential for the state. I registered two years ago. It took them a year to contact me.’

“What are you doing here today?

“‘We had our first session a week ago. Today they gave us our identification tags and asked us to submit our last testament…’

“Zahra has [indeed] written a last testament. [It says]: ‘Throughout my life, my goal has been to become a martyr, and now I have managed [to attain this goal]. My father fought on the front [during the Iran-Iraq war], and I too am eager to become a martyr and to fight on the front. Had I been alive during the [Iran-Iraq] war, I would have surely gone to fight on the front. Perhaps [back then] I would not have gone, but today this is my heart’s desire…’

“‘My other goal is to destroy the enemies in the event that war breaks out, God forbid, and Iran or some other country is invaded, like Iraq was attacked.’

“[Zahra also told me:] ‘They told us that if [Supreme] Leader [Khamenei] rules that jihad must be waged, [the martyrdom seekers] will be sent to [perform] martyrdom [operations]…’

“[I said to her:] I wonder about [your level of] readiness. Do you even know what a martyrdom operation is?

“[She answered:] ‘It’s just like in Palestine. They strap explosives [to your body], and then you attack in some location where the enemies gather, for instance in the Zionist settlements. If [one of us] is selected, he must go [and carry out the operation].’

“Have you reached the stage where you are ready [to do this]?

“‘Yes.’

 

“The Martyrs of the Mine Fields

“Hamid Davoudabadi, writer and expert on the [Iran-Iraq] war, [told me], ‘Some [operations] during the war were martyrdom operations. [There were incidents] in which 40 children swept a mine field in order to set off the mines and clear the way for [the soldiers] who followed. Before setting out, these children hid for several hours behind an earth rampart, to avoid being hit by a bullet… One of them told me: “If you are hit by a bullet you don’t count as a martyr.” Preserving one’s life is a commandment in Islam. But these children who spoke this way all stepped into the mine fields and became martyrs.’

“Davoudabadi explained the essence of martyrdom: ‘It is very important to consider this issue, and to ask ourselves why a person would come to the point that he kills himself in order to hurt the enemy and save his people. The root of the matter is that when a person is under siege, he has no choice. In war, there is the oppressor and the oppressed, and that is why such operations are carried out. The Palestinians [suffered] 50 years of Israeli violence before realizing that it is possible for one of them to kill [himself], [in order to] inflict graver harm on the enemy. [In a martyrdom operation], we lose one person [but] kill hundreds of [the enemy]…’

“Davoudabadi stressed: ‘The first [Iranians] who carried out martyrdom operations received religious authorization [to do so] from the Imam [Khomeini]. They were Shi’ites, and acknowledged the authority of the ruling jurisprudent. At that time, the ruling jurisprudent was Khomeini, and it was he who gave them religious authorization. Back then, there were those who regarded martyrdom operations as mere acts of suicide… Some of them expressed their concern to Khomeini, and he told them: “It is definitely allowed, it is definitely allowed, it is definitely allowed.” However, he set out conditions under which martyrdom operations were considered licit, [saying that] civilians must not be hurt in these operations.’

“[I asked Davoudabadi:] Are these conditions being met [today]?

“‘In Lebanon, the martyrdom-seekers displayed great sensitivity, making sure to time their operations in such a way that no civilian would be in the vicinity. In one case, there were some children playing nearby, [so the martyrdom seekers] gave them some chewing gum and chocolates, and sent them away on some excuse. Those who wish to condemn martyrdom operations obviously state that they [cause] civilians to be killed. [It is true that] on some occasions and in some places, civilians may be accidentally hurt. [Attacks] from the air, for example, inevitably result in the death of civilians. But in [planning] martyrdom operations, all aspects can be considered [in order to make sure that] children and women are not killed. According to data published by the enemy, 95% of the Israelis are soldiers. [In any case], all [Israeli] civilians are armed.’

“The fact that they are armed makes them soldiers?

“They are paramilitary… In an area populated by Muslims, they build four houses inhabited by Jews, and give them guns. [Then these Jews] kill [Muslims] under the pretext of defending their homes and families. The areas populated by Israelis are like army camps. A martyr who blows himself up among people lining up for the bus knows that early in the morning these buses are packed with Zionist soldiers en route to their bases.”

 

 

*A. Savyon is Director of MEMRI’s Iranian Media Project; M. Nissimov and Y. Mansharof are MEMRI Research Fellows.


[1]Fars (Iran), January 28, 2008.

[2]For an interview in which Rajai-Far states that she has signed up for martyrdom operations, see MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 181, ” The Internal Debate in Iran: How to Respond to Western Pressure Regarding Its Nuclear Program,” June 17, 2004,

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA18104. For an interview in which Rajai-Far condones suicide operations, see MEMRI TV Clip No. 736, “On the Iranian Movement of Martyrdom Seekers”, July 2, 2005, http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/736.htm. For an interview in which Rajai-Far threatens suicide operations against U.S. forces in the Gulf, see MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1378, “Top Iranian Military Commanders: In Case of Attack on Iran, We’ll Target U.S. Troops in Gulf; U.S. Warships ‘Have No Maneuverability and Are Easily Sunk’; Iranian Suicide Squad Commander: We’ll Carry Out Suicide Operations in Gulf Countries,” December 6, 2006, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP137806.

[3]See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 181, ” The Internal Debate in Iran: How to Respond to Western Pressure Regarding Its Nuclear Program,” June 17, 2004,

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA18104.

[4] Sharq (Iran), June 5, 2004.

[5] Iranian Channel 1 TV, May 2, 2008.

[6]Farda (Iran), January 29, 2008.

[7]See MEMRI TV Clip No. 782, “Iranian President-Elect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: “Is There Art that Is More Beautiful, More Divine, and More Eternal than the Art of Martyrdom?” July 25, 2005, http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/782.htm.

[8]ISNA (Iran), February 20, 2008.

[9] Parto-ye Sokhan (Iran), February 6, 2008.

[10]See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 945, “Iran’s New President Glorifies Martyrdom,” July 27, 2005, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP94505.

[11]See also MEMRI TV Clip No. 906, “Iranian Animated Film for Children Promotes Suicide Bombings,” http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/906.htm; MEMRI TV Clip No. 1648, “Israeli Villains Assassinate Abu Jihad and Harass Lebanese, Leading Young Man to Commit Suicide Bombing in an Iranian TV Movie,” (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1648.htm.

[12]See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 407, “Iran’s Response to Western Warnings: ‘First Strike,’ ‘Preemptive Attack,’ Long-Range Ballistic Missiles, ‘Asymmetric [Guerilla] Warfare,’” November 28, 2007, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=iran&ID=IA40707.

[13]Fars (Iran), October 29, 2008.

[14]Aftab (Iran), May 3, 2008.

[15]The Zanan website has since been blocked to access from inside Iran. However, the article was also posted on the website of Iranian journalist Manuchehr Honarmand, who resides in Europe, (www.khandaniha.eu/items.php?id=244). Recently, a slightly modified version of the article was posted on the Zanan website, now accessible only from outside the country (http://www.zanan.co.ir/social/000822.html ).

[16] The word “settlers” refers to Israeli civilians, who according to the official Iranian line are all illegal settlers.

[17]Nader Mahdavi was an IRGC naval commander who died in a 1987 suicide mission against the U.S. Navy in the Persian Gulf.

[18]The battle in 680 in which Ali and 70 of his supporters were killed by the Omayyad Caliph Yazid bin Muawiya.

Published in: on June 3, 2008 at 2:53 pm Comments (1)

Absence – 2.29.2008

For the last week I have been extremely busy preparing my work for a portfolio review by County Board of Education personnel. Needless to say that has cut into my blogging time, hence the lack of posts. But the good news is that I did well, the review is over and I can now return to the world of Samnite Gladiator.

 Mike Grant — Samnite Gladiator

Published in: on February 29, 2008 at 1:51 pm Leave a Comment

Another One Bites the Dust – 2.21.2008

Maybe he should have looked out for falling objects. The US Military has now confirmed that another senior Jihadist in Iraq has bought the farm. I don’t think he will be missed. By me anyway.

 Mike Grant — Samnite Gladiator

Published in: on February 21, 2008 at 5:21 pm Leave a Comment

Bosnia Revisited – 2.18.2008

I know many of us lead busy lives and when we have an opportunity to sit down and read, we may want to read enjoyable, light-hearted fiction, rather than delve into the dark parts of the world that we live in. I myself prefer the nitty-gritty details of foreign affairs rather, something my aunt bemoans every once and a while — Read something happy for once!

But I view it as integral on my quest for knowledge to inform myself, and journey into the minds of our enemies, as well as mankinds ancient killing grounds to better understand how to fight against the evil in this world. This brings me to revisit Bosnia, site of the brutal and bloody Bosnian-Serb-Croatian War from 1991-1995. During the Bosnian-Serb-Croatian War I aged from 2-6 so I was of course ignorant of all these occurrences, but I am sure that many of you may remember this war as being presented on CNN as a war between good and evil; innocent Muslims against the aggressive Christian Serbs. Reading Microsoft Encarta 2005 would have to you believe that as well. I am here to inform you that you couldn’t be more wrong.

I am just about finished an outstandingly well written, immensely informative, and infuriating book entitled “Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa’ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad” by John R. Schindler, Professor of Strategy, U.S. Naval War College. I received this book for Christmas from my father, whom I inherited my rabid interest in foreign affairs from, and I knew immediately that I would like it. I will admit that at first I was skeptical — vague memories of discussions about the Bosnian War and clips from CNN had left their impressions — and I knew that the Serb leader Slobodan Milošević was in prison for war crimes. However, those “impressions” were immediately washed away by cold, stark reality.

Bosnia was not as clear cut as presented, and there were no “good guys” as championed by the Clinton Administration, CNN, and NGOs. “Unholy Terror” is about how the world was duped into funding, arming, and politically supporting the brutal, barbaric, and radical Islamic Jihadiststhat made Bosnia their proving ground for terror. John Schindler lays all this out in great detail and even handedness. He by no means cuts the Serbs slack in their ethnic cleansing campaigns of desired Serbian territory. He merely sets the record straight as to the “innocence” of Bosnia ruling Muslim political party, the SDA, and their leader Alija Izetbegovic.

 Muslim Jihadists — imported from Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Morocco, Afghanistan, Jordan, and other Middle Eastern countries — formed the backbone of Bosnian fighters against the Serbs. Also, SDA sanctioned ethnic cleansing, concentration camps, and other wartime atrocities (which received no attention in Western media) were just as rampant as the Serbs. A few noteworthy incidents:

1) Muslim Jihadists beheading infidels with chainsaws

2) Stationing mortar crews next to Saravejo hospitals to draw fire from Serbian artillery

3) Serbian sniper teams – employed by the SDA — to shoot Muslim civilians in Sarajevo to gain more political capital to use against the West

You get the picture. I am not even scratching the surface of what happened, and what the United States and other European powers abetted, in Bosnia. I urge all people concerned with our War with Islamic Fascism to read this book and learn the truth about the Bosnian-Serb-Croatian War of 1991-1995.

 Mike Grant — Samnite Gladiator

P.S. — Feel free to post your feedback and thoughts on the book after you read it.

Published in: on February 19, 2008 at 12:05 am Comments (3)

Jihad- 1.30.2008

Just by chance, I found the blog of Muslim comedian Sherif Heydayat today. Among other things, he mentioned his offence that citizens in Dayton Ohio had opposed the construction of a mosque in their neighborhood. I left a comment explaining my viewpoint, which I will further expand upon here.  Just as some background info, I regularly read Robert Spencer and Daniel Pipes, two Islamic scholars. For those of you who agree with them, my opinions should be old news. For those who view Spencer and Pipes as misguided, bigoted, and racist individuals, you will likely disagree (if not vehemently) with me and dismiss me as an Islamophobe. For those of you who don’t know what the heck I’m talking about, heed my words. 

THE JIHAD

There are two interpretations to what Jihad is. Some believe that it signifies an inner struggle to attain that mystical stage of being, enlightenment. Others use it as justification for violent and unending warfare against the enemies of Islam, the kuffar (unbeliever). Right now the Jihad of the Sword is the dominant interpretation. Practically every day, I receive emails from MEMRI like this one, Pakistani Taliban Emir By’atullah Mahsoud: We Will Destroy America and Britain. These calls for Jihad are backed and justified from quotations of Holy Scriptures in the Qu’ran, the holy book of Islam full of Mohammed’s teaching and revelations. Note that these justifications are crystal clear in their meaning. Note that Qu’ran 9:05 is officially known to some as “Verse of the Sword”. For my purposes, all passages supporting Jihad of the Sword will be called such:

“Jihad of the Sword” – Qu’ran 8:12“Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.”  

“Verse of the Sword” – Qu’ran 9:05“So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”

“Jihad of the Sword” – Qu’ran 9:29“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”

“Jihad of the Sword” – Qu’ran 9:30“And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”

This is just a small sample size of Qu’ranic scriptures that justify, defend, and encourage Jihad. I have linked the site here. If you want to check my work, simply type idolater, fight, and angel into the first search engine and select the proper verse number. I the history of Jihad, the kuffar have had three choices.

One – Accept Islam and convert.

Two – Pay the jizya (tax) to the Muslim rulers and live as an infidel. Now people may think that paying a tax wouldn’t be so bad. They couldn’t be more wrong. Notice in 9:29 how it says may they “feel themselves subdued”. In shar’ia a kuffar has no rights; they are below second class citizens and are virtual slaves. Their houses of worship may have no bells or crosses. A kuffar’s house may not be higher than a Muslim’s house, in public they are forbidden to wear the color green, which is the color of Islam, and they must wear a badge marking their status. Think the Star of David for the Jews in Nazi Germany. Since a kuffar is by definition untrustworthy, it is impossible for fair representation in a court of law. If a kuffar alleges mistreatment by a Muslim, the Muslim simply denies it and the case is closed. Also, the jizya is not simply a tax in money. During the years of the Ottoman Empire, young Christian boys were taken from their families and trained either as the Janissary Slave Soldiers or as eunuchs for the Sultan’s court. Women were taken as concubines. I could go on and on. 

Three – Jihad

An unending state of Holy War that is the responsibility of all good Muslims. The war will continue until the enemies of Islam are destroyed, converted, or subjugated. 

DOUBLE SPEAK AND THE SUBTLETY OF JIHAD

Omar Bin Laden, son of Osama, has been in the news recently stating that he wishes to be “an ambassador for peace” between the West and Islam. At face value, one might think that that’s just great. However, reality is far more subtle and deadly. For one thing Omar does not denounce his father’s actions or renounce his father’s goals of an Islamic Caliphate (kingdom) stretching across the world. Another common motif among Islamic double speakers today is saying that they protest the killing of innocent civilians and that it is forbidden by the Qu’ran and thus against Islam. What they aren’t telling the West is the Islamic definition of “innocent civilian”. For an Islamist (someone who either tacitly or openly support Jihad), an innocent civilian is a Muslim. The same protection is not extended to the kuffar, since:

“Jihad of the Sword” – Qu’ran 33:061 

“They shall have a curse on them: whenever they are found they shall be seized and slain (without mercy).”

RADICALIZATION IN MOSQUES

What Christian Church is known to recruit people for a Christian Crusade? None. What mosques, madrassas, and imams are known and proven to recruit people for Islamic Jihad? A disturbingly high number, even in the “moderate” West. Just Google “terrorist recruitment” and you’ll see what I am talking about.  

IN CLOSING

But back to Omar bin Laden. He also says that “My father thinks he will be good for defending the Arab people and stop anyone from hurting the Arab or Muslim people any place in the world.” Who are the Muslims of the world being oppressed by? Fellow Muslims, ironically enough. Not the evil Zionists or the Great Satan USA, but fellow Muslims like Osama bin Laden. Who suffered in the torture houses of Iraq at the hands of Al’Qaida in Iraq where the victims were dismembered, burned, or had the knee caps and other joints drilled though by an electric drill? Fellow Muslims have suffered the most and bled the most in the 10,462 terror attacks meant to further the Jihad since September 11, 2001.The bottom line is this. Jihad is here and is here to stay. We can’t wish it away and we can’t delude ourselves that we negotiate with supposed “moderates” who say one thing and mean another. The true moderates, they do exist, do not hesitate to call their brothers and sisters from Jihad. However, these true moderates are either ignored, killed, or incarcerated and their influence minimized. This will be a long war and we cannot shirk from it. Our future depends on our ability to face these challenges and persevere. 

DISCLAIMER

I am not an Islamic scholar. So please, anyone who criticizes me don’t use that weak excuse. The verses I used were crystal clear in their intent. Anyone interested in learning more about Islamic law should visit jihadwatch.org or simply buy the following books:

“The Truth about Mohammed” by Robert Spencer

“Religion of Peace?” also by Robert Spencer

Mike Grant — Samnite Gladiator 

Published in: on January 31, 2008 at 12:53 am Comments (3)

Why the Holocaust is Different – 1.30.2008

While surfing WordPress today, I came across this chucklehead:

Desert Peace – the writer apparently sympathizes with Palestinian supporters of Jihad and offers a story to support his views. Before getting into the meat of my comment, I’ll say this. Israel and indeed all Jews everywhere, are under siege by Islamic forces seeking to destroy them. It has been this way for decades. In war there are casualties, plain and simple. It isn’t the fault of the Palestinian couple in the story that Hamas, Fatah, and other jihadist organizations use ambulances to deliver bombs and transport fighters (hence the ban on ambulances), but that’s the way it is.

Below is my comment I left on Desert Peace:

You question how the Jewish Holocaust is different from Rwanda, Condo, Russia, and China. I will explain. The millions of people killed in said countries were casualties of war. The killing was barbaric, yes. However, it was not planned like the Jewish Holocaust was. In Congo and Rwanda, tribal societies were merely butchering each other, as they had been for hundreds of years. The only difference was that they were using modern weapons of war, which increased the casualty count. In Russia, the German Army exercised the scorched earth policy, which meant aerial and artillery bombardment of all areas in a city. In China the Japanese merely butchered people for the fun of it. While all the killings above were evil, they were spontaneous.

There was no master plan as there was for the Jews. In Nazi Germany, you had people planning the most efficient way to butcher millions of people; first firing squads, then gas chambers. Men, women, and children it didn’t matter. Also, over 6 million Jews lost their lives in the Holocaust, a systematic extermination that lasted six years.

 Also, to be blunt, the world expects more from Europe and Asia than we expect of Arica. Africa is a hell hole plain and simple. It is steeped in the blood of many, but because Africa has never built a society (period) other than a tribal one, the attitude is more along the lines of “what do you expect, its Africa.” – end comment 

I will get into greater detail on Islamic law, Jihad, and Islamic hatred of the Jews in a column I am currently working on.

 

Mike Grant – Samnite Gladiator

Published in: on January 30, 2008 at 12:32 pm Leave a Comment